BO was once again in the news for his speech at the Notre Dame graduation in which he called for us to reach “common ground” and “talk with each other” about abortion. Why? Does anyone really believe BO is going to compromise on his pro-abortion rights viewpoint? Not on your life. His objective is to move conservatives to middle ground of compromise. Does anyone in their right mind believe that his new nominee to the supreme court will try to reach common ground with those who oppose abortion? This is another chink in the armor of conservative values. We’re witnessing before our very eyes and ears one of the last bastions of conservative voice (Catholic Church) for the unborn life slowly disintegrate. Most of the faculty and student body was overjoyed that he was invited, accepted, and spoke. He was met with only minimal protest and most of that from outside groups. Should the Jews compromise and find “common ground” on the holocaust? Would the NAACP invite a slave owner to come and speak about compromise and opening talks about ending slavery?” If there is nothing wrong with abortion, why compromise at all? If it’s all about freedom and liberty and there are no moral issues involved, no compromise is necessary. Problem is, everyone, even liberals know that it is a moral issue. This administration spends millions of dollars, time, effort to “save planet earth.” As Matt Spivey said it so well:
President Obama continued this disconnected rhetoric by urging this generation to “decide how to save God’s creation from a changing climate that threatens to destroy it.” Strangely, though, the president seems okay destroying one of God’s other creations. Only in a liberal’s mind would saving the planet carry more value than saving a life.
If only they would spend 1/10 the time, effort, and dollars to save an unborn child. Perhaps Al Gore and Michael Moore could do a documentary on the life of an unborn child? I doubt it.
Recent Comments